Back to Blog
3 min read

Gemini vs GPT: Practical Comparison for Enterprise Applications

Google’s Gemini models provide an alternative to OpenAI’s GPT series. Understanding their differences helps you choose the right model for your use cases.

Model Overview

AspectGPT-4 TurboGemini ProGemini Ultra
Context Window128K32K128K
MultimodalVision supportNativeNative
Pricing$0.01/1K input~$0.00125/1KHigher
AvailabilityAzure, OpenAIGoogle CloudLimited preview

API Comparison

GPT-4 (Azure OpenAI)

from openai import AzureOpenAI

client = AzureOpenAI(
    azure_endpoint="https://your-resource.openai.azure.com/",
    api_key="your-key",
    api_version="2024-02-15-preview"
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="gpt-4-turbo",
    messages=[
        {"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."},
        {"role": "user", "content": "Explain quantum computing in simple terms."}
    ],
    temperature=0.7,
    max_tokens=1000
)

print(response.choices[0].message.content)

Gemini (Google AI)

import google.generativeai as genai

genai.configure(api_key="your-api-key")
model = genai.GenerativeModel('gemini-pro')

response = model.generate_content(
    "Explain quantum computing in simple terms.",
    generation_config={
        "temperature": 0.7,
        "max_output_tokens": 1000
    }
)

print(response.text)

Benchmarks

Reasoning Tasks

reasoning_prompt = """
A farmer has 17 sheep. All but 9 run away. How many sheep does the farmer have left?
Think through this step by step.
"""

# Both models typically answer correctly (9 sheep)
# GPT-4 tends to provide more detailed reasoning
# Gemini is often faster to respond

Code Generation

code_prompt = """
Write a Python function to find the longest palindromic substring.
Include docstring and type hints.
"""

# Both produce quality code
# GPT-4 often includes more comprehensive tests
# Gemini sometimes provides more concise solutions

Multimodal

# Gemini native multimodal
import PIL.Image

image = PIL.Image.open("document.png")
response = model.generate_content([
    "Extract all text from this image and summarize the key points.",
    image
])

# GPT-4 Vision
response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="gpt-4-vision-preview",
    messages=[
        {
            "role": "user",
            "content": [
                {"type": "text", "text": "Extract all text and summarize."},
                {"type": "image_url", "image_url": {"url": f"data:image/png;base64,{base64_image}"}}
            ]
        }
    ]
)

Strengths and Weaknesses

GPT-4 Strengths

  • More consistent instruction following
  • Better at complex multi-step reasoning
  • Larger ecosystem and tooling
  • Stronger enterprise support (Azure)

Gemini Strengths

  • Native multimodal (text, image, video)
  • Faster inference for many tasks
  • Lower cost for high-volume applications
  • Better Google Cloud integration

When to Use Each

use_case_recommendations = {
    "gpt4_better": [
        "Complex reasoning and analysis",
        "Code generation requiring high accuracy",
        "Enterprise applications on Azure",
        "Applications requiring extensive function calling"
    ],
    "gemini_better": [
        "Multimodal applications (image/video analysis)",
        "High-volume, cost-sensitive workloads",
        "Google Cloud native applications",
        "Real-time conversational interfaces"
    ],
    "either_works": [
        "General Q&A chatbots",
        "Text summarization",
        "Basic content generation",
        "Translation tasks"
    ]
}

Multi-Model Strategy

def route_to_model(task_type: str, requirements: dict) -> str:
    """Route task to appropriate model."""

    if requirements.get("needs_vision") and requirements.get("video"):
        return "gemini-pro-vision"  # Better video support

    if requirements.get("complex_reasoning"):
        return "gpt-4-turbo"  # Better for complex tasks

    if requirements.get("cost_sensitive") and task_type == "simple_qa":
        return "gemini-pro"  # Lower cost

    if requirements.get("azure_required"):
        return "gpt-4-turbo"  # Azure ecosystem

    return "gpt-4-turbo"  # Default to GPT-4 for reliability

Conclusion

Both GPT-4 and Gemini are capable foundation models. GPT-4 excels in reasoning and enterprise features, while Gemini offers native multimodal and cost advantages. Consider a multi-model strategy to leverage the strengths of each.

Michael John Peña

Michael John Peña

Senior Data Engineer based in Sydney. Writing about data, cloud, and technology.