1 min read
Service Mesh Comparison: Istio vs Linkerd vs Open Service Mesh
Service meshes handle service-to-service communication in Kubernetes. Each option has different tradeoffs in complexity, performance, and features.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Istio | Linkerd | OSM |
|---|---|---|---|
| mTLS | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Traffic Management | Advanced | Basic | Moderate |
| Observability | Extensive | Good | Good |
| Resource Usage | High | Low | Moderate |
| Complexity | High | Low | Moderate |
Istio
apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1alpha3
kind: VirtualService
metadata:
name: reviews-route
spec:
hosts:
- reviews
http:
- match:
- headers:
user:
exact: jason
route:
- destination:
host: reviews
subset: v2
- route:
- destination:
host: reviews
subset: v1
Linkerd
apiVersion: policy.linkerd.io/v1beta1
kind: Server
metadata:
name: api-server
spec:
podSelector:
matchLabels:
app: api
port: 8080
Open Service Mesh
apiVersion: specs.smi-spec.io/v1alpha4
kind: TrafficSplit
metadata:
name: canary-split
spec:
service: api
backends:
- service: api-v1
weight: 90
- service: api-v2
weight: 10
Summary
Choose based on your needs: Linkerd for simplicity, Istio for features, OSM for Azure integration.
References: