Back to Blog
1 min read

Service Mesh Comparison: Istio vs Linkerd vs Open Service Mesh

Service meshes handle service-to-service communication in Kubernetes. Each option has different tradeoffs in complexity, performance, and features.

Feature Comparison

FeatureIstioLinkerdOSM
mTLSYesYesYes
Traffic ManagementAdvancedBasicModerate
ObservabilityExtensiveGoodGood
Resource UsageHighLowModerate
ComplexityHighLowModerate

Istio

apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1alpha3
kind: VirtualService
metadata:
  name: reviews-route
spec:
  hosts:
  - reviews
  http:
  - match:
    - headers:
        user:
          exact: jason
    route:
    - destination:
        host: reviews
        subset: v2
  - route:
    - destination:
        host: reviews
        subset: v1

Linkerd

apiVersion: policy.linkerd.io/v1beta1
kind: Server
metadata:
  name: api-server
spec:
  podSelector:
    matchLabels:
      app: api
  port: 8080

Open Service Mesh

apiVersion: specs.smi-spec.io/v1alpha4
kind: TrafficSplit
metadata:
  name: canary-split
spec:
  service: api
  backends:
  - service: api-v1
    weight: 90
  - service: api-v2
    weight: 10

Summary

Choose based on your needs: Linkerd for simplicity, Istio for features, OSM for Azure integration.


References:

Michael John Peña

Michael John Peña

Senior Data Engineer based in Sydney. Writing about data, cloud, and technology.