GPT-4 Is Here: Analyzing the Announcement
OpenAI just announced GPT-4, and it’s a significant leap forward. I’ve spent the day analyzing the technical report and testing capabilities. Here’s what matters for practitioners.
The Headlines
- Multimodal: GPT-4 accepts images as input (text output only for now)
- Larger context: 8K tokens standard, 32K tokens available
- Better reasoning: Passes bar exam in 90th percentile (GPT-3.5: 10th)
- More reliable: Significantly reduced hallucination in testing
- Already in Bing: Bing Chat has been running on GPT-4 since launch
Benchmark Results
OpenAI tested GPT-4 on professional and academic exams:
| Exam | GPT-4 | GPT-3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Bar Exam | 90th percentile | 10th percentile |
| LSAT | 88th percentile | 40th percentile |
| GRE Quantitative | 80th percentile | 25th percentile |
| AP Calculus BC | 43rd percentile | Failed |
| Codeforces | 392 rating | Below 5th percentile |
This isn’t just incremental improvement - it’s a capability threshold crossing.
What This Means for Code
I’ve been testing GPT-4 on coding tasks. The improvement is substantial:
# Task: Implement a rate limiter with sliding window
# GPT-4 Response (with explanation)
import time
from collections import deque
from threading import Lock
class SlidingWindowRateLimiter:
"""
Token bucket rate limiter with sliding window.
Uses a deque to track request timestamps, providing O(1) amortized
operations for checking and recording requests.
"""
def __init__(self, max_requests: int, window_seconds: float):
"""
Args:
max_requests: Maximum requests allowed in the window
window_seconds: Size of the sliding window in seconds
"""
self.max_requests = max_requests
self.window_seconds = window_seconds
self.requests = deque()
self.lock = Lock()
def is_allowed(self) -> bool:
"""Check if a request is allowed and record it if so."""
with self.lock:
now = time.time()
cutoff = now - self.window_seconds
# Remove expired timestamps
while self.requests and self.requests[0] < cutoff:
self.requests.popleft()
if len(self.requests) < self.max_requests:
self.requests.append(now)
return True
return False
def wait_time(self) -> float:
"""Return seconds to wait before next request is allowed."""
with self.lock:
if len(self.requests) < self.max_requests:
return 0
oldest = self.requests[0]
return max(0, oldest + self.window_seconds - time.time())
# GPT-4 also provides usage example and tests
limiter = SlidingWindowRateLimiter(max_requests=100, window_seconds=60)
# Check before making request
if limiter.is_allowed():
make_api_call()
else:
wait = limiter.wait_time()
print(f"Rate limited, wait {wait:.1f}s")
GPT-4’s code is:
- More complete with docstrings and type hints
- Handles edge cases (thread safety, expired cleanup)
- Includes practical usage examples
- Better algorithmic choices
Testing Vision Capabilities
The vision capabilities aren’t publicly available yet (waitlist), but the demos are impressive:
# Expected API format (based on demos)
response = openai.ChatCompletion.create(
model="gpt-4-vision-preview",
messages=[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{"type": "text", "text": "What's wrong with this architecture diagram?"},
{
"type": "image_url",
"image_url": {"url": "https://example.com/architecture.png"}
}
]
}
]
)
Potential applications:
- Analyzing dashboards and charts
- Understanding system architecture diagrams
- Processing screenshots for debugging
- Extracting data from images
Context Window Impact
The 32K token context is transformative:
def analyze_large_document(document: str, question: str) -> str:
"""Analyze documents up to ~50 pages with GPT-4 32K."""
# 32K tokens ≈ 24,000 words ≈ 50 pages
if len(document.split()) > 24000:
raise ValueError("Document too large for single-pass analysis")
response = openai.ChatCompletion.create(
model="gpt-4-32k",
messages=[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are a document analyst. Answer questions about the provided document accurately and cite relevant sections."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": f"Document:\n{document}\n\nQuestion: {question}"
}
],
temperature=0.2
)
return response.choices[0].message.content
# Examples of what's now possible in a single pass:
# - Full legal contract analysis
# - Complete codebase review
# - Long-form technical documentation analysis
# - Extended conversation history
Improved Reliability
GPT-4 is more factually grounded:
# GPT-4 system prompt for factual tasks
FACTUAL_SYSTEM_PROMPT = """You are a helpful assistant that provides accurate information.
Rules:
1. If you're not certain about something, say so
2. Distinguish between facts and opinions
3. When appropriate, suggest how the user can verify information
4. If a question is outside your knowledge, acknowledge the limitation
Your knowledge cutoff is September 2021."""
def get_factual_response(question: str) -> dict:
"""Get response with confidence indication."""
response = openai.ChatCompletion.create(
model="gpt-4",
messages=[
{"role": "system", "content": FACTUAL_SYSTEM_PROMPT},
{"role": "user", "content": f"{question}\n\nProvide your answer and indicate your confidence level (high/medium/low)."}
],
temperature=0.1
)
return {
"answer": response.choices[0].message.content,
"model": "gpt-4",
"note": "Verify important information from authoritative sources"
}
Pricing Reality
GPT-4 is significantly more expensive:
| Model | Input | Output |
|---|---|---|
| GPT-3.5 Turbo | $0.002/1K | $0.002/1K |
| GPT-4 (8K) | $0.03/1K | $0.06/1K |
| GPT-4 (32K) | $0.06/1K | $0.12/1K |
GPT-4 is 15-60x more expensive than GPT-3.5. This changes architecture decisions:
class CostAwareRouter:
"""Route requests based on cost-benefit analysis."""
def __init__(self, gpt4_budget_daily: float = 100.0):
self.gpt4_budget = gpt4_budget_daily
self.gpt4_spent_today = 0.0
def should_use_gpt4(
self,
task_complexity: str,
estimated_tokens: int,
quality_critical: bool = False
) -> bool:
"""Decide whether to use GPT-4."""
# Always use GPT-4 for quality-critical tasks
if quality_critical:
return True
# Check budget
estimated_cost = (estimated_tokens / 1000) * 0.09 # Avg of input/output
if self.gpt4_spent_today + estimated_cost > self.gpt4_budget:
return False
# Use GPT-4 for complex tasks
complex_tasks = ["code_review", "legal_analysis", "architecture", "debugging"]
if task_complexity in complex_tasks:
self.gpt4_spent_today += estimated_cost
return True
# Default to GPT-3.5 for simple tasks
return False
Immediate Actions
- Request access: GPT-4 API access is limited; join the waitlist
- Test your prompts: Many prompts need adjustment for GPT-4
- Update cost models: Budget for 30x cost increase for GPT-4 tasks
- Identify high-value use cases: Where does quality matter most?
- Plan for Azure: GPT-4 will come to Azure OpenAI
What I’m Building
Starting today, I’m updating my applications to:
- Route complex reasoning tasks to GPT-4
- Keep simple tasks on GPT-3.5
- Prepare for vision capabilities
- Leverage longer context for document analysis
The AI capability curve just jumped. Time to adapt.