GPT-4 is Here: What Changes for Enterprise AI
OpenAI released GPT-4 this week, and within hours we learned that Bing Chat has been running on it since launch. This is a substantial leap forward, and I’ve been testing it to understand what it means for the applications we’re building.
What’s Different About GPT-4
Multimodal Capabilities
GPT-4 can process both text and images. This isn’t just OCR - it understands visual content:
import openai
response = openai.ChatCompletion.create(
model="gpt-4-vision-preview",
messages=[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{"type": "text", "text": "Analyze this architecture diagram and identify potential bottlenecks."},
{"type": "image_url", "image_url": {"url": "https://..."}}
]
}
]
)
For data and analytics professionals, this opens up:
- Analyzing charts and dashboards
- Interpreting architecture diagrams
- Understanding whiteboard sketches
- Processing scanned documents
Significantly Better Reasoning
OpenAI tested GPT-4 on professional exams:
- Bar Exam: 90th percentile (GPT-3.5: 10th percentile)
- GRE Quantitative: 80th percentile
- AP Calculus BC: 43rd percentile (GPT-3.5: failed)
This translates to better performance on complex tasks like:
- Multi-step data analysis
- SQL query optimization
- Architecture decision reasoning
- Debugging complex code
Longer Context Window
GPT-4 supports 8K tokens standard, with a 32K token version available. For context:
- 8K tokens ≈ 6,000 words
- 32K tokens ≈ 25,000 words
This means you can include much more context in your prompts - entire documents, long codebases, or extensive conversation histories.
# With GPT-4 32K, you can analyze entire files
with open('large_codebase.py', 'r') as f:
code = f.read() # Up to ~50 pages of code
response = openai.ChatCompletion.create(
model="gpt-4-32k",
messages=[
{"role": "system", "content": "You are a senior code reviewer."},
{"role": "user", "content": f"Review this code for performance issues and security vulnerabilities:\n\n{code}"}
]
)
Practical Implications for Data Platforms
Better SQL Generation
GPT-4’s improved reasoning shows immediately in SQL generation:
prompt = """Given these tables:
- orders (order_id, customer_id, order_date, total_amount, status)
- customers (customer_id, name, segment, created_date)
- order_items (item_id, order_id, product_id, quantity, unit_price)
- products (product_id, name, category, supplier_id)
Write an optimized SQL query to find the top 10 customers by total spend,
including only completed orders from the last 90 days, with their most
frequently purchased product category.
"""
# GPT-4 generates correct window functions, CTEs, and handles the edge cases
GPT-4 consistently handles complex joins, window functions, and edge cases better than GPT-3.5.
Architecture Analysis
I tested GPT-4’s ability to analyze data architectures:
architecture_description = """
Our data platform:
- Sources: 50 APIs, 3 databases, event streams from Kafka
- Ingestion: Azure Data Factory copying to ADLS Gen2 raw zone
- Processing: Databricks for transformations, writing to curated zone
- Serving: Synapse dedicated pool for reporting, Cosmos DB for applications
- BI: Power BI datasets connected to Synapse
Issues:
- Nightly jobs take 8 hours, often fail
- Analysts complain about stale data
- Costs are growing 20% monthly
"""
prompt = f"Analyze this architecture and provide specific, actionable recommendations:\n\n{architecture_description}"
GPT-4’s response identified specific bottlenecks and provided concrete recommendations, including questioning whether the dedicated pool was necessary (it suggested Synapse Serverless for the reporting workload).
Document Understanding
With image input, GPT-4 can analyze:
- Data lineage diagrams
- ERD diagrams
- Power BI reports
- Architecture drawings
This is valuable for documentation review and understanding legacy systems.
The Azure Connection
Microsoft confirmed GPT-4 will be available in Azure OpenAI Service, though timeline wasn’t specified. Current Azure OpenAI customers should expect:
- Same API patterns, just new model deployment options
- Higher pricing tier (GPT-4 is ~30x more expensive than GPT-3.5)
- Potentially longer wait times during initial availability
What I’m Changing in My Approach
1. Moving Complex Analysis to GPT-4
For tasks requiring multi-step reasoning, GPT-4 is worth the cost premium. I’m now routing:
- Complex SQL optimization
- Code review tasks
- Architecture analysis
- Root cause analysis
2. Leveraging the Context Window
With 32K tokens, I can include:
- Full stored procedure definitions
- Complete configuration files
- Entire conversation histories for long-running analyses
3. Exploring Vision Capabilities
Initial experiments with diagram analysis are promising. Use cases I’m exploring:
- Automated architecture documentation
- Dashboard analysis and optimization suggestions
- Converting whiteboard designs to technical specs
Cost Considerations
GPT-4 is significantly more expensive:
- GPT-3.5 Turbo: $0.002 / 1K tokens
- GPT-4 (8K): $0.03 / 1K input, $0.06 / 1K output
- GPT-4 (32K): $0.06 / 1K input, $0.12 / 1K output
For high-volume applications, this matters. Strategy:
- Use GPT-3.5 for simple tasks (summarization, classification)
- Route complex reasoning to GPT-4
- Implement caching where possible
- Monitor and optimize prompt efficiency
def select_model(task_complexity: str, requires_vision: bool) -> str:
if requires_vision:
return "gpt-4-vision-preview"
elif task_complexity == "high":
return "gpt-4"
else:
return "gpt-3.5-turbo"
Limitations Still Present
Hallucination: GPT-4 still makes things up, just less frequently. RAG patterns remain essential.
Knowledge Cutoff: Training data ends September 2021. Current Azure features and APIs still require documentation lookup.
Speed: GPT-4 is slower than GPT-3.5. For interactive applications, consider streaming responses.
The Bigger Picture
GPT-4 represents a capability threshold crossing. Tasks that were unreliable with GPT-3.5 are now viable:
- Reliable complex code generation
- Nuanced document analysis
- Multi-step problem solving
The pace of improvement is remarkable. GPT-4 in many ways exceeds what I expected AI to achieve by 2025. For those of us building with these tools, the applications we can create are expanding rapidly.
Stay curious. Keep experimenting.